Genetic research led by University of Colorado scientists has produced several fascinating discoveries about Colorado's native cutthroat trout - including the location of the last surviving wild population of the federally protected greenback cutthroat trout.
Researchers analyzed DNA extracted from wild trout and from museum specimens collected from sites around Colorado and New Mexico as far back as 1856, then used that genetic data as a baseline for understanding the current distribution of Colorado's native cutthroat trout.
In addition to identifying the one remaining "true" greenback population, researchers identified three distinct genetic lineages within the range of Colorado River cutthroat trout, one in northwest Colorado, one in the San Juan River basin, and one in the Gunnison and upper Colorado River basins.
In all, six lineages of cutthroat appear to have evolved in Colorado, with native ranges that roughly correspond to major drainage basins in the state. The greenback cutthroat trout, Colorado's state fish, was native to the drainages of the South Platte, while the long extinct yellowfin cutthroat trout of Twin Lakes actually appears to have been the native trout of the Arkansas River Basin. Rio Grande cutthroat trout still can be found in streams that drain into the San Luis Valley, while three distinct lineages are found within the larger Colorado River Basin. More research will be required to resolve whether the three lineages that can be found across Colorado’s western slope are indeed two distinct subspecies – that work is ongoing.
Given that additional lineages of our native cutthroat trout were identified with the DNA testing, we wanted to determine if these lineages displayed different physical characteristics as well. This is particularly important since it has been argued that genetics should not be the sole factor in determining taxonomic distinctions, and that morphological traits (visual characteristics) are often better suited for discriminating taxa. A recent comprehensive study examined the relationship between the differences implied by the DNA and the morphology of these fish. Indeed, it appears that these new lineages can also be identified by examining morphological traits as well.